Commit 7b243aa6 authored by Peter Eisentraut's avatar Peter Eisentraut

Revert: looks like Binary Large OBject[sic] wasn't a misspelling

parent 5194b9d0
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.5 2010/08/17 04:37:20 petere Exp $ --> <!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.6 2010/08/17 04:47:04 petere Exp $ -->
<sect1 id="lo"> <sect1 id="lo">
<title>lo</title> <title>lo</title>
...@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ ...@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<para> <para>
One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver
also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary
Large Objects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the Large OBjects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
associated BLOB is deleted from the database. associated BLOB is deleted from the database.
</para> </para>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment