Commit 74bd0664 authored by Peter Eisentraut's avatar Peter Eisentraut

Add test case for ON DELETE NO ACTION/RESTRICT

This was previously not covered at all; function
RI_FKey_restrict_del() was not exercised in the tests.
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMi Tar <mmitar@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7ae17c95-0c99-d420-032a-c271f510112b@2ndquadrant.com/
parent 90525d7b
......@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ DETAIL: Key (f1)=(1) is still referenced from table "defc".
-- Test the difference between NO ACTION and RESTRICT
--
create temp table pp (f1 int primary key);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update no action);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update no action on delete no action);
insert into pp values(12);
insert into pp values(11);
update pp set f1=f1+1;
......@@ -1348,9 +1348,12 @@ update pp set f1=f1+1;
update pp set f1=f1+1; -- fail
ERROR: update or delete on table "pp" violates foreign key constraint "cc_f1_fkey" on table "cc"
DETAIL: Key (f1)=(13) is still referenced from table "cc".
delete from pp where f1 = 13; -- fail
ERROR: update or delete on table "pp" violates foreign key constraint "cc_f1_fkey" on table "cc"
DETAIL: Key (f1)=(13) is still referenced from table "cc".
drop table pp, cc;
create temp table pp (f1 int primary key);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update restrict);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update restrict on delete restrict);
insert into pp values(12);
insert into pp values(11);
update pp set f1=f1+1;
......@@ -1358,6 +1361,9 @@ insert into cc values(13);
update pp set f1=f1+1; -- fail
ERROR: update or delete on table "pp" violates foreign key constraint "cc_f1_fkey" on table "cc"
DETAIL: Key (f1)=(13) is still referenced from table "cc".
delete from pp where f1 = 13; -- fail
ERROR: update or delete on table "pp" violates foreign key constraint "cc_f1_fkey" on table "cc"
DETAIL: Key (f1)=(13) is still referenced from table "cc".
drop table pp, cc;
--
-- Test interaction of foreign-key optimization with rules (bug #14219)
......
......@@ -992,22 +992,24 @@ delete from defp where f1 = 1; -- fail
-- Test the difference between NO ACTION and RESTRICT
--
create temp table pp (f1 int primary key);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update no action);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update no action on delete no action);
insert into pp values(12);
insert into pp values(11);
update pp set f1=f1+1;
insert into cc values(13);
update pp set f1=f1+1;
update pp set f1=f1+1; -- fail
delete from pp where f1 = 13; -- fail
drop table pp, cc;
create temp table pp (f1 int primary key);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update restrict);
create temp table cc (f1 int references pp on update restrict on delete restrict);
insert into pp values(12);
insert into pp values(11);
update pp set f1=f1+1;
insert into cc values(13);
update pp set f1=f1+1; -- fail
delete from pp where f1 = 13; -- fail
drop table pp, cc;
--
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment