Re-add item with better description:
> * Allow ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 to select high/low value without sort or > index using a sequential scan for highest/lowest values > > Right now, if no index exists, ORDER BY ... LIMIT 1 requires we sort > all values to return the high/low value. Instead The idea is to do a > sequential scan to find the high/low value, thus avoiding the sort. >
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment