Commit 5ff68396 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Remove obsolete comment.

Obsoleted by commit 21dcda27, but I missed
seeing the cross-reference in the comments for exec_eval_integer().

Also improve the cross-reference in the comments for exec_eval_cleanup().
parent 959df4b5
......@@ -3219,7 +3219,7 @@ plpgsql_estate_setup(PLpgSQL_execstate *estate,
* unless it is a pass-by-value datatype.
*
* NB: if you change this code, see also the hacks in exec_assign_value's
* PLPGSQL_DTYPE_ARRAYELEM case.
* PLPGSQL_DTYPE_ARRAYELEM case for partial cleanup after subscript evals.
* ----------
*/
static void
......@@ -4749,8 +4749,7 @@ exec_get_datum_type_info(PLpgSQL_execstate *estate,
* Note we do not do exec_eval_cleanup here; the caller must do it at
* some later point. (We do this because the caller may be holding the
* results of other, pass-by-reference, expression evaluations, such as
* an array value to be subscripted. Also see notes in exec_eval_simple_expr
* about allocation of the parameter array.)
* an array value to be subscripted.)
* ----------
*/
static int
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment