Fix bogus handling of bad strategy number in GIST consistent() functions.
Make sure we throw an error instead of silently doing the wrong thing when fed a strategy number we don't recognize. Also, in the places that did already throw an error, spell the error message in a way more consistent with our message style guidelines. Per report from Paul Jones. Although this is a bug, it won't occur unless a superuser tries to do something he shouldn't, so it doesn't seem worth back-patching.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment