Commit 3dfce376 authored by Heikki Linnakangas's avatar Heikki Linnakangas

Fix typos in comment.

Plus some tiny wordsmithing of not-quite-typos.
parent 7391e251
......@@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ extern void pg_spinlock_barrier(void);
#ifndef pg_compiler_barrier_impl
/*
* If the compiler/arch combination does not provide compiler barriers,
* provide a fallback. That fallback simply consists out of a function call
* into a externally defined function. That should guarantee compiler barrier
* provide a fallback. The fallback simply consists of a function call into
* an externally defined function. That should guarantee compiler barrier
* semantics except for compilers that do inter translation unit/global
* optimization - those better provide an actual compiler barrier.
*
* Using a native compiler barrier for sure is a lot faster than this...
* A native compiler barrier for sure is a lot faster than this...
*/
#define PG_HAVE_COMPILER_BARRIER_EMULATION
extern void pg_extern_compiler_barrier(void);
......@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ extern void pg_extern_compiler_barrier(void);
/*
* If we have atomics implementation for this platform fall back to providing
* If we have atomics implementation for this platform, fall back to providing
* the atomics API using a spinlock to protect the internal state. Possibly
* the spinlock implementation uses semaphores internally...
*
......@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ pg_atomic_unlocked_test_flag_impl(volatile pg_atomic_flag *ptr)
/*
* Can't do this efficiently in the semaphore based implementation - we'd
* have to try to acquire the semaphore - so always return true. That's
* correct, because this is only an unlocked test anyway.Do this in the
* correct, because this is only an unlocked test anyway. Do this in the
* header so compilers can optimize the test away.
*/
return true;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment