Commit 39cb2ee0 authored by Michael Paquier's avatar Michael Paquier

Doc: Fix description of pg_class.relreplident

The description missed a comma and lacked an explanation of what happens
with REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX when the dependent index is dropped.

Author: Marina Polyakova
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ad1a0badc32658b1bbb07aa312346a1d@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.5
parent a56e7046
......@@ -2141,8 +2141,10 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable>&lt;iteration count&gt;</replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
Columns used to form <quote>replica identity</quote> for rows:
<literal>d</literal> = default (primary key, if any),
<literal>n</literal> = nothing,
<literal>f</literal> = all columns
<literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set, or default
<literal>f</literal> = all columns,
<literal>i</literal> = index with
<structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set (same as nothing if the
index used has been dropped)
</para></entry>
</row>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment