Commit 3438c988 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Use plain memset() in numeric.c, not MemSet and friends.

This essentially reverts a micro-optimization I made years ago,
as part of the much larger commit d72f6c75.  It's doubtful
that there was any hard evidence for it being helpful even then,
and the case is even more dubious now that modern compilers
are so much smarter about inlining memset().

The proximate reason for undoing it is to get rid of the type punning
inherent in MemSet, for fear that that may cause problems now that
we're applying additional optimization switches to numeric.c.
At the very least this'll silence some warnings from a few old
buildfarm animals.

(It's probably past time for another look at whether MemSet is still
worth anything at all, but I do not propose to tackle that question
right now.)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9evtA_vBo+WMYMyT-u=keHX7-r8p2w7OSRfXf42LTwCZQ@mail.gmail.com
parent 728d4bc1
...@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static void dump_var(const char *str, NumericVar *var); ...@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ static void dump_var(const char *str, NumericVar *var);
pfree(buf); \ pfree(buf); \
} while (0) } while (0)
#define init_var(v) MemSetAligned(v, 0, sizeof(NumericVar)) #define init_var(v) memset(v, 0, sizeof(NumericVar))
#define NUMERIC_DIGITS(num) (NUMERIC_HEADER_IS_SHORT(num) ? \ #define NUMERIC_DIGITS(num) (NUMERIC_HEADER_IS_SHORT(num) ? \
(num)->choice.n_short.n_data : (num)->choice.n_long.n_data) (num)->choice.n_short.n_data : (num)->choice.n_long.n_data)
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment