Commit 1d96cf94 authored by Bruce Momjian's avatar Bruce Momjian

In documentation, change "recommendable" to "recommended", per

consultation with word definitions.

Backpatch to 9.2.
parent 51fd748e
...@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ SELECT * FROM test1 ORDER BY a || b COLLATE "fr_FR"; ...@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ SELECT * FROM test1 ORDER BY a || b COLLATE "fr_FR";
<literal>pg_collation</literal> are ignored. Thus, a stripped collation <literal>pg_collation</literal> are ignored. Thus, a stripped collation
name such as <literal>de_DE</literal> can be considered unique name such as <literal>de_DE</literal> can be considered unique
within a given database even though it would not be unique globally. within a given database even though it would not be unique globally.
Use of the stripped collation names is recommendable, since it will Use of the stripped collation names is recommended, since it will
make one less thing you need to change if you decide to change to make one less thing you need to change if you decide to change to
another database encoding. Note however that the <literal>default</>, another database encoding. Note however that the <literal>default</>,
<literal>C</>, and <literal>POSIX</> collations can be used <literal>C</>, and <literal>POSIX</> collations can be used
......
...@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ su - postgres ...@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ su - postgres
<para> <para>
You need an <acronym>ISO</>/<acronym>ANSI</> C compiler (at least You need an <acronym>ISO</>/<acronym>ANSI</> C compiler (at least
C89-compliant). Recent C89-compliant). Recent
versions of <productname>GCC</> are recommendable, but versions of <productname>GCC</> are recommended, but
<productname>PostgreSQL</> is known to build using a wide variety <productname>PostgreSQL</> is known to build using a wide variety
of compilers from different vendors. of compilers from different vendors.
</para> </para>
......
...@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ ...@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
connection level. If one <productname>PostgreSQL</> server connection level. If one <productname>PostgreSQL</> server
instance is to house projects or users that should be separate and instance is to house projects or users that should be separate and
for the most part unaware of each other, it is therefore for the most part unaware of each other, it is therefore
recommendable to put them into separate databases. If the projects recommended to put them into separate databases. If the projects
or users are interrelated and should be able to use each other's or users are interrelated and should be able to use each other's
resources, they should be put in the same database but possibly resources, they should be put in the same database but possibly
into separate schemas. Schemas are a purely logical structure and who can into separate schemas. Schemas are a purely logical structure and who can
......
...@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ ...@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
This limits the usefulness of the <filename>passwordcheck</filename> This limits the usefulness of the <filename>passwordcheck</filename>
module, because in that case it can only try to guess the password. module, because in that case it can only try to guess the password.
For this reason, <filename>passwordcheck</filename> is not For this reason, <filename>passwordcheck</filename> is not
recommendable if your security requirements are high. recommended if your security requirements are high.
It is more secure to use an external authentication method such as Kerberos It is more secure to use an external authentication method such as Kerberos
(see <xref linkend="client-authentication">) than to rely on (see <xref linkend="client-authentication">) than to rely on
passwords within the database. passwords within the database.
......
...@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ SELECT product_id, p.name, (sum(s.units) * (p.price - p.cost)) AS profit ...@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ SELECT product_id, p.name, (sum(s.units) * (p.price - p.cost)) AS profit
Currently, window functions always require presorted data, and so the Currently, window functions always require presorted data, and so the
query output will be ordered according to one or another of the window query output will be ordered according to one or another of the window
functions' <literal>PARTITION BY</>/<literal>ORDER BY</> clauses. functions' <literal>PARTITION BY</>/<literal>ORDER BY</> clauses.
It is not recommendable to rely on this, however. Use an explicit It is not recommended to rely on this, however. Use an explicit
top-level <literal>ORDER BY</> clause if you want to be sure the top-level <literal>ORDER BY</> clause if you want to be sure the
results are sorted in a particular way. results are sorted in a particular way.
</para> </para>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment