Commit 17411e0f authored by Peter Eisentraut's avatar Peter Eisentraut

doc: Fix typos

Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
parent 8d1c1ca7
...@@ -3431,7 +3431,7 @@ ALTER TABLE measurement ATTACH PARTITION measurement_y2008m02 ...@@ -3431,7 +3431,7 @@ ALTER TABLE measurement ATTACH PARTITION measurement_y2008m02
define any check constraints on this table, unless you intend them define any check constraints on this table, unless you intend them
to be applied equally to all partitions. There is no point in to be applied equally to all partitions. There is no point in
defining any indexes or unique constraints on it, either. For our defining any indexes or unique constraints on it, either. For our
example, master table is the <structname>measurement</structname> example, the master table is the <structname>measurement</structname>
table as originally defined. table as originally defined.
</para> </para>
</listitem> </listitem>
...@@ -3943,7 +3943,7 @@ EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM measurement WHERE logdate &gt;= DATE '2008-01-01'; ...@@ -3943,7 +3943,7 @@ EXPLAIN SELECT count(*) FROM measurement WHERE logdate &gt;= DATE '2008-01-01';
Constraint exclusion works in a very similar way to partition Constraint exclusion works in a very similar way to partition
pruning, except that it uses each table's <literal>CHECK</literal> pruning, except that it uses each table's <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraints &mdash; which gives it its name &mdash; whereas partition constraints &mdash; which gives it its name &mdash; whereas partition
pruning uses the table's partition bounds, which exists only in the pruning uses the table's partition bounds, which exist only in the
case of declarative partitioning. Another difference is that case of declarative partitioning. Another difference is that
constraint exclusion is only applied at plan time; there is no attempt constraint exclusion is only applied at plan time; there is no attempt
to remove partitions at execution time. to remove partitions at execution time.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment