Improve slightly misleading comments in nodeFuncs.c
There were some comments in nodeFuncs.c that, depending on your interpretation of the word "result", could lead you to believe that the comments were badly copied and pasted from somewhere else. If you thought of "result" as the return value of the function that the comment is written in, then you'd be misled. However, if you'd correctly interpreted "result" to mean the result type of the given node type, you'd not have seen any issues. Here we do a small cleanup to try to prevent any future misinterpretations. Per wording suggestion from Tom Lane. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvp+Bw=2Qiu5=uXMKfC7gd0+B=4JvexVgGJU=am2g9a1CA@mail.gmail.com
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment