-
Peter Geoghegan authored
When commit f425b605 introduced cost based vacuum delays back in 2004, the defaults reflected then-current trends in hardware, as well as certain historical limitations in PostgreSQL. There have been enormous improvements in both areas since that time. The cost limit GUC defaults finally became much more representative of current trends following commit cbccac37, which decreased autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay's default by 10x for PostgreSQL 12 (it went from 20ms to only 2ms). The relative costs have shifted too. This should also be accounted for by the defaults. More specifically, the relative importance of avoiding dirtying pages within VACUUM has greatly increased, primarily due to main memory capacity scaling and trends in flash storage. Within Postgres itself, improvements like sequential access during index vacuuming (at least in nbtree and GiST indexes) have also been contributing factors. To reflect all this, decrease the default of vacuum_cost_page_miss to 2. Since the default of vacuum_cost_page_dirty remains 20, dirtying a page is now considered 10x "costlier" than a page miss by default. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmLPFnkWT8xMjmcsm7YS3+_Qi3iRWAb2+_Bc8UhVyHfuA@mail.gmail.com
e19594c5