-
Tom Lane authored
This LOG message was put in over five years ago with the evident expectation that we'd make all GiST opclasses support secondary split directly. However, no such thing ever happened, and indeed the number of opclasses supporting it decreased to zero in 9.2. The reason is that improving on the default implementation isn't that easy --- the opclass-specific code that did exist, before 9.2, doesn't appear to have been any improvement over the default. Hence, remove the message altogether. There's certainly no point in nagging users about this in released branches, but I doubt that we'll ever implement complete opclass-specific support anyway.
db3d7e9f