-
Tom Lane authored
We've been speculating for a long time that hash-based keyword lookup ought to be faster than binary search, but up to now we hadn't found a suitable tool for generating the hash function. Joerg Sonnenberger provided the inspiration, and sample code, to show us that rolling our own generator wasn't a ridiculous idea. Hence, do that. The method used here requires a lookup table of approximately 4 bytes per keyword, but that's less than what we saved in the predecessor commit afb0d071, so it's not a big problem. The time savings is indeed significant: preliminary testing suggests that the total time for raw parsing (flex + bison phases) drops by ~20%. Patch by me, but it owes its existence to Joerg Sonnenberger; thanks also to John Naylor for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190103163340.GA15803@britannica.bec.de
c64d0cd5