-
Tom Lane authored
1. Resurrect the behavior where old commits on master will have Branch: labels for branches sprouted after the commit was made. I'm still dubious about this mode, but if you want it, say --post-date or -p. 2. Annotate the Branch: labels with the release or branch in which the commit was publicly released. For example, on a release branch you could see Branch: REL8_3_STABLE Release: REL8_3_2 [92c3a8004] 2008-03-29 00:15:37 +0000 showing that the fix was released in 8.3.2. Commits on master will usually instead have notes like Branch: master Release: REL8_4_BR [6fc9d427] 2008-03-29 00:15:28 +0000 showing that this commit is ancestral to release branches 8.4 and later. If no Release: marker appears, the commit hasn't yet made it into any release. 3. Add support for release branches older than 7.4. 4. The implementation is improved by running git log on each branch only back to where the branch sprouts from master. This saves a good deal of time (about 50% of the runtime when generating the complete history). We generate the post-date-mode tags via a direct understanding that they should be applied to master commits made before the branch sprouted, rather than backing into them via matching (which isn't any too reliable when people used identical log messages for successive commits).
bf429ceb