-
Tom Lane authored
Once upon a time, it made sense for the ecpg preprocessor to have its own version number, because it used a manually-maintained grammar that wasn't always in sync with the core grammar. But those days are thankfully long gone, leaving only a maintenance nuisance behind. Let's use the PG v10 version numbering changeover as an excuse to get rid of the ecpg version number and just have ecpg identify itself by PG_VERSION. From the user's standpoint, ecpg will go from "4.12" in the 9.6 branch to "10" in the 10 branch, so there's no failure of monotonicity. Discussion: <1471332659.4410.67.camel@postgresql.org>
a7b5573d