While the calculation is not well-defined if the bounds arguments are
infinite, there is a perfectly sane outcome if the test operand is
infinite: it's just like any other value that's before the first bucket
or after the last one.  width_bucket_float8() got this right, but
I was too hasty about the case when adding infinities to numerics
(commit a57d312a), so that width_bucket_numeric() just rejected it.
Fix that, and sync the relevant error message strings.

No back-patch needed, since infinities-in-numeric haven't shipped yet.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2465409.1602170063@sss.pgh.pa.us