Since we no longer require AccessExclusiveLock to add a partition,
the executor may see that a partitioned table has more partitions
than the planner saw.  ExecCreatePartitionPruneState's code for
matching up the partition lists in such cases was faulty, and would
misbehave if the planner had successfully pruned any partitions from
the query.  (Thus, trouble would occur only if a partition addition
happens concurrently with a query that uses both static and dynamic
partition pruning.)  This led to an Assert failure in debug builds,
and probably to crashes or query misbehavior in production builds.

To repair the bug, just explicitly skip zeroes in the plan's
relid_map[] list.  I also made some cosmetic changes to make the code
more readable (IMO anyway).  Also, convert the cross-checking Assert
to a regular test-and-elog, since it's now apparent that this logic
is more fragile than one would like.

Currently, there's no way to repeatably exercise this code, except
with manual use of a debugger to stop the backend between planning
and execution.  Hence, no test case in this patch.  We oughta do
something about that testability gap, but that's for another day.

Amit Langote and Tom Lane, per report from Justin Pryzby.  Oversight
in commit 898e5e32; backpatch to v12 where that appeared.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200802181131.GA27754@telsasoft.com