An update that causes the tuple to be moved to a different partition was
missing out on re-constructing the to-be-updated tuple, based on the latest
tuple in the update chain.  Instead, it's simply deleting the latest tuple
and inserting a new tuple in the new partition based on the old tuple.
Commit 2f178441 didn't consider this case, so some of the updates were
getting lost.

In passing, change the argument order for output parameter in ExecDelete
and add some commentary about it.

Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee
Author: Amit Khandekar, with minor changes by me
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila and Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=Bcgjc8quqKsDViKQ@mail.gmail.com