-
Tom Lane authored
These functions must be careful that they return the intended value of errno to their callers. There were several scenarios where this might not happen: 1. The recent SSL renegotiation patch added a hunk of code that would execute after setting errno. In the first place, it's doubtful that we should consider renegotiation to be successfully completed after a failure, and in the second, there's no real guarantee that the called OpenSSL routines wouldn't clobber errno. Fix by not executing that hunk except during success exit. 2. errno was left in an unknown state in case of an unrecognized return code from SSL_get_error(). While this is a "can't happen" case, it seems like a good idea to be sure we know what would happen, so reset errno to ECONNRESET in such cases. (The corresponding code in libpq's fe-secure.c already did this.) 3. There was an (undocumented) assumption that client_read_ended() wouldn't change errno. While true in the current state of the code, this seems less than future-proof. Add explicit saving/restoring of errno to make sure that changes in the called functions won't break things. I see no need to back-patch, since #1 is new code and the other two issues are mostly hypothetical. Per discussion with Amit Kapila.
36a3be65