The test cases added by commit 26ae3aa8 exposed an old oversight in
timestamp[tz]_part: they didn't correct the result of date2isoyear()
for BC years, so that we produced an off-by-one answer for such years.
Fix that, and back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SG2PR06MB37762CAE45DB0F6CA7001EA9B6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com