Commit f34f0e4c authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Last-minute updates for release notes.

The set of functions that need parallel-safety adjustments isn't the
same in 9.6 as 10, so I shouldn't have blindly back-patched that list.
Adjust as needed.  Also, provide examples of the commands to issue.
parent b56d5f23
......@@ -106,10 +106,12 @@ Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [485857d44] 2018-03-30 18:14:51 -0400
installations will continue to contain the incorrect markings.
Practical use of these functions seems to pose little hazard, but in
case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.query_to_xml(text, boolean,
boolean, text) VOLATILE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be
done in each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......@@ -146,10 +148,12 @@ Branch: REL9_6_STABLE [91d82317d] 2018-03-30 18:14:51 -0400
incorrect markings. Practical use of these functions seems to pose
little hazard unless <varname>force_parallel_mode</varname> is turned
on. In case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.brin_summarize_new_values(regclass)
PARALLEL UNSAFE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be done in
each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......
......@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@
installations will continue to contain the incorrect markings.
Practical use of these functions seems to pose little hazard, but in
case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.query_to_xml(text, boolean,
boolean, text) VOLATILE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be
done in each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......
......@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@
installations will continue to contain the incorrect markings.
Practical use of these functions seems to pose little hazard, but in
case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.query_to_xml(text, boolean,
boolean, text) VOLATILE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be
done in each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......
......@@ -59,10 +59,12 @@
installations will continue to contain the incorrect markings.
Practical use of these functions seems to pose little hazard, but in
case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.query_to_xml(text, boolean,
boolean, text) VOLATILE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be
done in each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......
......@@ -91,10 +91,12 @@
installations will continue to contain the incorrect markings.
Practical use of these functions seems to pose little hazard, but in
case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.query_to_xml(text, boolean,
boolean, text) VOLATILE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be
done in each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......@@ -107,15 +109,12 @@
<para>
The functions
<function>brin_summarize_new_values</function>,
<function>brin_summarize_range</function>,
<function>brin_desummarize_range</function>,
<function>gin_clean_pending_list</function>,
<function>cursor_to_xml</function>,
<function>cursor_to_xmlschema</function>,
<function>ts_rewrite</function>,
<function>ts_stat</function>,
<function>binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension</function>, and
<function>pg_import_system_collations</function>
<function>ts_stat</function>, and
<function>binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension</function>
should be marked parallel-unsafe; some because they perform database
modifications directly, and others because they execute user-supplied
queries that might do so. They were marked parallel-restricted
......@@ -125,10 +124,12 @@
incorrect markings. Practical use of these functions seems to pose
little hazard unless <varname>force_parallel_mode</varname> is turned
on. In case of trouble, it can be fixed by manually updating these
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries. (Note that that
will need to be done in each database of the installation.) Another
option is to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a
version containing the corrected initial data.
functions' <structname>pg_proc</structname> entries, for example
<literal>ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.brin_summarize_new_values(regclass)
PARALLEL UNSAFE</literal>. (Note that that will need to be done in
each database of the installation.) Another option is
to <application>pg_upgrade</application> the database to a version
containing the corrected initial data.
</para>
</listitem>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment