Commit cbf65509 authored by Heikki Linnakangas's avatar Heikki Linnakangas

Fix the number of lwlocks needed by the "fast path" lock patch. It needs

one lock per backend or auxiliary process - the need for a lock for each
aux processes was not accounted for in NumLWLocks(). No-one noticed,
because the three locks needed for the three aux processes fit into the
few extra lwlocks we allocate for 3rd party modules that don't call
RequestAddinLWLocks() (NUM_USER_DEFINED_LWLOCKS, 4 by default).
parent 051d1ba7
......@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ NumLWLocks(void)
/* bufmgr.c needs two for each shared buffer */
numLocks += 2 * NBuffers;
/* lock.c needs one per backend */
numLocks += MaxBackends;
/* proc.c needs one for each backend or auxiliary process */
numLocks += MaxBackends + NUM_AUXILIARY_PROCS;
/* clog.c needs one per CLOG buffer */
numLocks += NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment