Recent changes in memory management in tuplesort.c had a problem: the
case where we run low on array slots before we run low on memory is much more probable than I had thought, and so it's important to treat each tape fairly in that case. To fix this, track per-tape slot allocations just like we track per-tape space allocation. Also, in the FINALMERGE code path avoid scanning all the input tapes when we really only need to read from one. This should fix poor behavior with very large work_mem as exhibited by Stefan Kaltenbrunner. I didn't do anything about putting an upper bound on the number of tapes, but maybe we should still consider that.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment