Change various Gin*Is* macros to return 0/1.
Returning the direct result of bit arithmetic, in a macro intended to be used in a boolean manner, can be problematic if the return value is stored in a variable of type 'bool'. If bool is implemented using C99's _Bool, that can lead to comparison failures if the variable is then compared again with the expression (see ginStepRight() for an example that fails), as _Bool forces the result to be 0/1. That happens in some configurations of newer MSVC compilers. It's also problematic when storing the result of such an expression in a narrower type. Several gin macros have been declared in that style since gin's initial commit in 8a3631f8. There's a lot more macros like this, but this is the only one causing regression test failures; and I don't want to commit and backpatch a larger patch with lots of conflicts just before the next set of minor releases. Discussion: 20150811154237.GD17575@awork2.anarazel.de Backpatch: All supported branches
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment