Commit 9492cf86 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Fix assorted fallout from IS [NOT] NULL patch.

Commits 4452000f et al established semantics for NullTest.argisrow that
are a bit different from its initial conception: rather than being merely
a cache of whether we've determined the input to have composite type,
the flag now has the further meaning that we should apply field-by-field
testing as per the standard's definition of IS [NOT] NULL.  If argisrow
is false and yet the input has composite type, the construct instead has
the semantics of IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL.  Update the comments in
primnodes.h to clarify this, and fix ruleutils.c and deparse.c to print
such cases correctly.  In the case of ruleutils.c, this merely results in
cosmetic changes in EXPLAIN output, since the case can't currently arise
in stored rules.  However, it represents a live bug for deparse.c, which
would formerly have sent a remote query that had semantics different
from the local behavior.  (From the user's standpoint, this means that
testing a remote nested-composite column for null-ness could have had
unexpected recursive behavior much like that fixed in 4452000f.)

In a related but somewhat independent fix, make plancat.c set argisrow
to false in all NullTest expressions constructed to represent "attnotnull"
constructs.  Since attnotnull is actually enforced as a simple null-value
check, this is a more accurate representation of the semantics; we were
previously overpromising what it meant for composite columns, which might
possibly lead to incorrect planner optimizations.  (It seems that what the
SQL spec expects a NOT NULL constraint to mean is an IS NOT NULL test, so
arguably we are violating the spec and should fix attnotnull to do the
other thing.  If we ever do, this part should get reverted.)

Back-patch, same as the previous commit.

Discussion: <10682.1469566308@sss.pgh.pa.us>
parent 46b773d4
...@@ -2347,10 +2347,27 @@ deparseNullTest(NullTest *node, deparse_expr_cxt *context) ...@@ -2347,10 +2347,27 @@ deparseNullTest(NullTest *node, deparse_expr_cxt *context)
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '('); appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
deparseExpr(node->arg, context); deparseExpr(node->arg, context);
/*
* For scalar inputs, we prefer to print as IS [NOT] NULL, which is
* shorter and traditional. If it's a rowtype input but we're applying a
* scalar test, must print IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL to be semantically
* correct.
*/
if (node->argisrow || !type_is_rowtype(exprType((Node *) node->arg)))
{
if (node->nulltesttype == IS_NULL) if (node->nulltesttype == IS_NULL)
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NULL)"); appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NULL)");
else else
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NOT NULL)"); appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NOT NULL)");
}
else
{
if (node->nulltesttype == IS_NULL)
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NOT DISTINCT FROM NULL)");
else
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS DISTINCT FROM NULL)");
}
} }
/* /*
......
...@@ -1198,7 +1198,13 @@ get_relation_constraints(PlannerInfo *root, ...@@ -1198,7 +1198,13 @@ get_relation_constraints(PlannerInfo *root,
att->attcollation, att->attcollation,
0); 0);
ntest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL; ntest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL;
ntest->argisrow = type_is_rowtype(att->atttypid);
/*
* argisrow=false is correct even for a composite column,
* because attnotnull does not represent a SQL-spec IS NOT
* NULL test in such a case, just IS DISTINCT FROM NULL.
*/
ntest->argisrow = false;
ntest->location = -1; ntest->location = -1;
result = lappend(result, ntest); result = lappend(result, ntest);
} }
......
...@@ -8047,6 +8047,16 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context, ...@@ -8047,6 +8047,16 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context)) if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context))
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '('); appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_rule_expr_paren((Node *) ntest->arg, context, true, node); get_rule_expr_paren((Node *) ntest->arg, context, true, node);
/*
* For scalar inputs, we prefer to print as IS [NOT] NULL,
* which is shorter and traditional. If it's a rowtype input
* but we're applying a scalar test, must print IS [NOT]
* DISTINCT FROM NULL to be semantically correct.
*/
if (ntest->argisrow ||
!type_is_rowtype(exprType((Node *) ntest->arg)))
{
switch (ntest->nulltesttype) switch (ntest->nulltesttype)
{ {
case IS_NULL: case IS_NULL:
...@@ -8059,6 +8069,22 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context, ...@@ -8059,6 +8069,22 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized nulltesttype: %d", elog(ERROR, "unrecognized nulltesttype: %d",
(int) ntest->nulltesttype); (int) ntest->nulltesttype);
} }
}
else
{
switch (ntest->nulltesttype)
{
case IS_NULL:
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS NOT DISTINCT FROM NULL");
break;
case IS_NOT_NULL:
appendStringInfoString(buf, " IS DISTINCT FROM NULL");
break;
default:
elog(ERROR, "unrecognized nulltesttype: %d",
(int) ntest->nulltesttype);
}
}
if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context)) if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context))
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')'); appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
} }
......
...@@ -1099,8 +1099,16 @@ typedef struct XmlExpr ...@@ -1099,8 +1099,16 @@ typedef struct XmlExpr
* NullTest represents the operation of testing a value for NULLness. * NullTest represents the operation of testing a value for NULLness.
* The appropriate test is performed and returned as a boolean Datum. * The appropriate test is performed and returned as a boolean Datum.
* *
* NOTE: the semantics of this for rowtype inputs are noticeably different * When argisrow is false, this simply represents a test for the null value.
* from the scalar case. We provide an "argisrow" flag to reflect that. *
* When argisrow is true, the input expression must yield a rowtype, and
* the node implements "row IS [NOT] NULL" per the SQL standard. This
* includes checking individual fields for NULLness when the row datum
* itself isn't NULL.
*
* NOTE: the combination of a rowtype input and argisrow==false does NOT
* correspond to the SQL notation "row IS [NOT] NULL"; instead, this case
* represents the SQL notation "row IS [NOT] DISTINCT FROM NULL".
* ---------------- * ----------------
*/ */
...@@ -1114,7 +1122,7 @@ typedef struct NullTest ...@@ -1114,7 +1122,7 @@ typedef struct NullTest
Expr xpr; Expr xpr;
Expr *arg; /* input expression */ Expr *arg; /* input expression */
NullTestType nulltesttype; /* IS NULL, IS NOT NULL */ NullTestType nulltesttype; /* IS NULL, IS NOT NULL */
bool argisrow; /* T if input is of a composite type */ bool argisrow; /* T to perform field-by-field null checks */
int location; /* token location, or -1 if unknown */ int location; /* token location, or -1 if unknown */
} NullTest; } NullTest;
......
...@@ -665,9 +665,9 @@ select r, r is null as isnull, r is not null as isnotnull ...@@ -665,9 +665,9 @@ select r, r is null as isnull, r is not null as isnotnull
from (values (1,row(1,2)), (1,row(null,null)), (1,null), from (values (1,row(1,2)), (1,row(null,null)), (1,null),
(null,row(1,2)), (null,row(null,null)), (null,null) ) r(a,b); (null,row(1,2)), (null,row(null,null)), (null,null) ) r(a,b);
QUERY PLAN QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Values Scan on "*VALUES*" Values Scan on "*VALUES*"
Output: ROW("*VALUES*".column1, "*VALUES*".column2), (("*VALUES*".column1 IS NULL) AND ("*VALUES*".column2 IS NULL)), (("*VALUES*".column1 IS NOT NULL) AND ("*VALUES*".column2 IS NOT NULL)) Output: ROW("*VALUES*".column1, "*VALUES*".column2), (("*VALUES*".column1 IS NULL) AND ("*VALUES*".column2 IS NOT DISTINCT FROM NULL)), (("*VALUES*".column1 IS NOT NULL) AND ("*VALUES*".column2 IS DISTINCT FROM NULL))
(2 rows) (2 rows)
select r, r is null as isnull, r is not null as isnotnull select r, r is null as isnull, r is not null as isnotnull
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment