Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
P
Postgres FD Implementation
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Abuhujair Javed
Postgres FD Implementation
Commits
8f2977b3
Commit
8f2977b3
authored
Oct 22, 2015
by
Peter Eisentraut
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
doc: Add advice on updating checkpoint_segments to max_wal_size
with suggestion from Michael Paquier
parent
d371bebd
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
16 additions
and
0 deletions
+16
-0
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
+16
-0
No files found.
doc/src/sgml/release-9.5.sgml
View file @
8f2977b3
...
...
@@ -152,6 +152,22 @@
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
The configuration parameter <varname>checkpoint_segments</varname> has
been removed. Its place is taken by the new
setting <xref linkend="guc-max-wal-size">. If you had previously
tuned <varname>checkpoint_segments</varname>, the following formula will
give you an approximately equivalent setting:
<programlisting>
max_wal_size = (3 * checkpoint_segments) * 16MB
</programlisting>
Note that the default setting for <varname>max_wal_size</varname> is
much higher than the default <varname>checkpoint_segments</varname> used
to be, so setting this might no longer be necessary.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<!--
2015-07-28 [6087d95] Andres..: Remove ssl renegotiation support.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment