From 7e4a6294929cc0c9bb17441e639c013b679a127b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 21:27:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] zero_damaged_pages must absolutely NOT be marked
 GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE, else it cannot be used to handle failures detected
 during WAL replay. Fortunately this flag isn't actually enforced yet, but get
 it right.

---
 src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index fd9def3e6c..44e492b6a9 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
  * Written by Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>.
  *
  * IDENTIFICATION
- *	  $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c,v 1.165 2003/11/06 22:08:15 petere Exp $
+ *	  $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c,v 1.166 2003/11/07 21:27:38 tgl Exp $
  *
  *--------------------------------------------------------------------
  */
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static struct config_bool ConfigureNamesBool[] =
 						 "zero_damaged_pages to true causes the system to instead report a "
 						 "warning, zero out the damaged page, and continue processing. This "
 						 "behavior will destroy data, namely all the rows on the damaged page."),
-			GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE | GUC_DISALLOW_IN_FILE
+			GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE
 		},
 		&zero_damaged_pages,
 		false, NULL, NULL
-- 
2.24.1