Commit 7cdcc747 authored by Robert Haas's avatar Robert Haas

Update neglected comment.

Commit d986d4e8 renamed a variable
but neglected to update the corresponding comment.

Amit Langote
parent 30364019
...@@ -3033,8 +3033,8 @@ ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate, ...@@ -3033,8 +3033,8 @@ ExecBRUpdateTriggers(EState *estate, EPQState *epqstate,
/* /*
* In READ COMMITTED isolation level it's possible that target tuple * In READ COMMITTED isolation level it's possible that target tuple
* was changed due to concurrent update. In that case we have a raw * was changed due to concurrent update. In that case we have a raw
* subplan output tuple in newSlot, and need to run it through the * subplan output tuple in epqslot_candidate, and need to run it
* junk filter to produce an insertable tuple. * through the junk filter to produce an insertable tuple.
* *
* Caution: more than likely, the passed-in slot is the same as the * Caution: more than likely, the passed-in slot is the same as the
* junkfilter's output slot, so we are clobbering the original value * junkfilter's output slot, so we are clobbering the original value
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment