Commit 7233aae5 authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Fix PPC s_lock operations to work correctly on multi-CPU machines.

Need 'isync' during TAS and 'sync' during S_UNLOCK.
parent b2735fcd
......@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c,v 1.8 2002/06/20 20:29:35 momjian Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c,v 1.9 2002/09/21 00:14:05 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
......@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ _success: \n\
/* used in darwin. */
/* We key off __APPLE__ here because this function differs from
* the LinuxPPC implementation only in compiler syntax.
*
* NOTE: per the Enhanced PowerPC Architecture manual, v1.0 dated 7-May-2002,
* an isync is a sufficient synchronization barrier after a lwarx/stwcx loop.
*/
static void
tas_dummy()
......@@ -134,6 +137,7 @@ tas: \n\
fail: li r3,1 \n\
blr \n\
success: \n\
isync \n\
li r3,0 \n\
blr \n\
");
......@@ -158,6 +162,7 @@ tas: \n\
fail: li 3,1 \n\
blr \n\
success: \n\
isync \n\
li 3,0 \n\
blr \n\
");
......
......@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2002, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* $Id: s_lock.h,v 1.100 2002/09/02 04:42:52 momjian Exp $
* $Id: s_lock.h,v 1.101 2002/09/21 00:14:05 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
......@@ -217,6 +217,21 @@ tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
#endif /* defined(__mc68000__) && defined(__linux__) */
#if defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__)
/*
* We currently use out-of-line assembler for TAS on PowerPC; see s_lock.c.
* S_UNLOCK is almost standard but requires a "sync" instruction.
*/
#define S_UNLOCK(lock) \
do \
{\
__asm__ __volatile__ (" sync \n"); \
*((volatile slock_t *) (lock)) = 0; \
} while (0)
#endif /* defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) */
#if defined(NEED_VAX_TAS_ASM)
/*
* VAXen -- even multiprocessor ones
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment