Commit 52985e4f authored by Tom Lane's avatar Tom Lane

Revert "Increase the default vacuum_cost_limit from 200 to 2000"

This reverts commit bd09503e.

Per discussion, it seems like what we should do instead is to
reduce the default value of autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay by the
same factor.  That's functionally equivalent as long as the
platform can accurately service the smaller delay request, which
should be true on anything released in the last 10 years or more.
And smaller, more-closely-spaced delays are better in terms of
providing a steady I/O load.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28720.1552101086@sss.pgh.pa.us
parent caf626b2
......@@ -1932,7 +1932,7 @@ include_dir 'conf.d'
<listitem>
<para>
The accumulated cost that will cause the vacuuming process to sleep.
The default value is 2000.
The default value is 200.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
......
......@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ int MaxBackends = 0;
int VacuumCostPageHit = 1; /* GUC parameters for vacuum */
int VacuumCostPageMiss = 10;
int VacuumCostPageDirty = 20;
int VacuumCostLimit = 2000;
int VacuumCostLimit = 200;
double VacuumCostDelay = 0;
int VacuumPageHit = 0;
......
......@@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ static struct config_int ConfigureNamesInt[] =
NULL
},
&VacuumCostLimit,
2000, 1, 10000,
200, 1, 10000,
NULL, NULL, NULL
},
......
......@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
#vacuum_cost_page_hit = 1 # 0-10000 credits
#vacuum_cost_page_miss = 10 # 0-10000 credits
#vacuum_cost_page_dirty = 20 # 0-10000 credits
#vacuum_cost_limit = 2000 # 1-10000 credits
#vacuum_cost_limit = 200 # 1-10000 credits
# - Background Writer -
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment