Fix postmaster's handling of a startup-process crash.
Ordinarily, a failure (unexpected exit status) of the startup subprocess should be considered fatal, so the postmaster should just close up shop and quit. However, if we sent the startup process a SIGQUIT or SIGKILL signal, the failure is hardly "unexpected", and we should attempt restart; this is necessary for recovery from ordinary backend crashes in hot-standby scenarios. I attempted to implement the latter rule with a two-line patch in commit 442231d7, but it now emerges that that patch was a few bricks shy of a load: it failed to distinguish the case of a signaled startup process from the case where the new startup process crashes before reaching database consistency. That resulted in infinitely respawning a new startup process only to have it crash again. To handle this properly, we really must track whether we have sent the *current* startup process a kill signal. Rather than add yet another ad-hoc boolean to the postmaster's state, I chose to unify this with the existing RecoveryError flag into an enum tracking the startup process's state. That seems more consistent with the postmaster's general state machine design. Back-patch to 9.0, like the previous patch.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment