Rework tuple freezing protocol
Tuple freezing was broken in connection to MultiXactIds; commit 8e53ae025de9 tried to fix it, but didn't go far enough. As noted by Noah Misch, freezing a tuple whose Xmax is a multi containing an aborted update might cause locks in the multi to go ignored by later transactions. This is because the code depended on a multixact above their cutoff point not having any lock-only member older than the cutoff point for Xids, which is easily defeated in READ COMMITTED transactions. The fix for this involves creating a new MultiXactId when necessary. But this cannot be done during WAL replay, and moreover multixact examination requires using CLOG access routines which are not supposed to be used during WAL replay either; so tuple freezing cannot be done with the old freeze WAL record. Therefore, separate the freezing computation from its execution, and change the WAL record to carry all necessary information. At WAL replay time, it's easy to re-execute freezing because we don't need to re-compute the new infomask/Xmax values but just take them from the WAL record. While at it, restructure the coding to ensure all page changes occur in a single critical section without much room for failures. The previous coding wasn't using a critical section, without any explanation as to why this was acceptable. In replication scenarios using the 9.3 branch, standby servers must be upgraded before their master, so that they are prepared to deal with the new WAL record once the master is upgraded; failure to do so will cause WAL replay to die with a PANIC message. Later upgrade of the standby will allow the process to continue where it left off, so there's no disruption of the data in the standby in any case. Standbys know how to deal with the old WAL record, so it's okay to keep the master running the old code for a while. In master, the old freeze WAL record is gone, for cleanliness' sake; there's no compatibility concern there. Backpatch to 9.3, where the original bug was introduced and where the previous fix was backpatched. Álvaro Herrera and Andres Freund
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment