Fix pg_upgrade to not fail when new-cluster TOAST rules differ from old.
This patch essentially reverts commit 4c6780fd, in favor of a much simpler solution for the case where the new cluster would choose to create a TOAST table but the old cluster doesn't have one: just don't create a TOAST table. The existing code failed in at least two different ways if the situation arose: (1) ALTER TABLE RESET didn't grab an exclusive lock, so that the lock sanity check in create_toast_table failed; (2) pg_upgrade did not provide a pg_type OID for the new toast table, so that the crosscheck in TypeCreate failed. While both these problems were introduced by later patches, they show that the hack being used to cause TOAST table creation is overwhelmingly fragile (and untested). I also note that before the TypeCreate crosscheck was added, the code would have resulted in assigning an indeterminate pg_type OID to the toast table, possibly causing a later OID conflict in that catalog; so that it didn't really work even when committed. If we simply don't create a TOAST table, there will only be a problem if the code tries to store a tuple that's wider than a page, and field compression isn't sufficient to get it under a page. Given that the TOAST creation threshold is intended to be about a quarter of a page, it's very hard to believe that cross-version differences in the do-we-need-a-toast- table heuristic could result in an observable problem. So let's just follow the old version's conclusion about whether a TOAST table is needed. (If we ever do change needs_toast_table() so much that this conclusion doesn't apply, we can devise a solution at that time, and hopefully do it in a less klugy way than 4c6780fd did.) Back-patch to 9.3, like the previous patch. Discussion: <8110.1462291671@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment